Publicaciones

Judge Posner’s Simple Law, 113 MICH. L. REV. __ (forthcoming 2015).

Conditional Spending and the Conditional Offer Puzzle, in FRITZ ALLHOFF & MARK HALL EDS., THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT DECISION: PHILOSOPHICAL AND LEGAL IMPLICATIONS 257 (Routledge 2014).

On What Distinguishes New Originalism From Old: A Jurisprudential Take, 82 FORDHAM L. REV. 545 (2013) (Symposium issue) (co-authored with Kevin Toh).

Pluralistic Non-originalism and the Combinability Problem, 91 TEX. L. REV. 1739 (2013) (Symposium issue) (co-authored with Kevin Toh). Coercion, Compulsion, and the Medicaid Expansion: A Study in the Doctrine of Unconstitutional Conditions, 91 TEX. L. REV. 1283 (2013).

Constitutional Interpretation: Non-originalism, 6 PHIL. COMPASS 408 (2011).

Reflective Equilibrium and Constitutional Method: Lessons from John McCain and the Natural Born Citizen Clause, in GRANT HUSCROFT & BRADLEY W. MILLER EDS., THE CHALLENGE OF ORIGINALISM: ESSAYS IN CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY 246 (Cambridge 2011).

Constitutional Constructions and Constitutional Decision Rules: Thoughts on the Carving of Implementation Space, 27 CONST. COMMENT. 39 (2010) (translated into Spanish as Construcciones constitucionales y reglas constitucionales de decisión: reflexiones sobre el cincelado del espacio de implementación, 38 ISONOMÍA 105 (2013)).

Constitutional Theory and the Rule of Recognition: Toward a Fourth Theory of Law, in MATTHEW D. ADLER & KENNETH E. HIMMA EDS., THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF RECOGNITION 269 (Oxford 2009).

Symposium: Supreme Court Review—Symposium Foreword, 44 TULSA L. REV. 467 (2009) (invited guest editor).

Originalism is Bunk, 84 NYU L. REV. 1 (2009).

Originalism and Its Discontents (Plus a Thought or Two About Abortion), 24 CONST. COMMENT. 383 (2007) (excerpted as chapter 8 in IT IS A CONSTITUTION WE ARE EXPOUNDING: COLLECTED WRITINGS ON INTERPRETING OUR FOUNDING DOCUMENT (2009)).

Aspirational Rights and the Two-Output Thesis, 119 HARV. L. REV. F. 220 (2006), www.harvardlawreview.org/forum/issues/119/mar06/berman.pdf (solicited contribution).

Managing Gerrymandering, 83 TEX. L. REV. 781 (2005).

Guillen and Gullibility: Piercing the Surface of Commerce Clause Doctrine, 89 IOWA L. REV. 1487 (2004).

Constitutional Decision Rules, 90 VA. L. REV. 1 (2004).

Getting Off the Dole: Why the Court Should Abandon Its Spending Doctrine, and How a TooClever Congress Could Provoke It to Do So, 78 IND. L.J. 459 (2003) (co-authored with Lynn A. Baker) (Symposium issue).

Commercial Speech and the Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine: A Second Look at “the Greater Includes the Lesser,” 55 VAND. L. REV. 693 (2002).

Coercion Without Baselines: Unconstitutional Conditions in Three Dimensions, 90 GEO. L.J. 1 (2001).

State Accountability for Violations of Intellectual Property Rights: How To “Fix” Florida Prepaid (and How Not To), 79 TEX. L. REV. 1037 (2001) (co-authored with R. Anthony Reese and Ernest A. Young).

Regulating Violence on Television, 89 NW. U. L. REV. 1487 (1995) (co-authored with Harry T. Edwards).

Note, Removal and the Eleventh Amendment: The Case for District Court Remand Discretion To Avoid a Bifurcated Suit, 92 MICH. L. REV. 683 (1993) (named best student contribution to the Michigan Law Review, vol. 92).

Modest Retributivism, in KIM FERZAN & STEPHEN MORSE EDS., LEGAL, MORAL, AND METAPHYSICAL TRUTHS: THE PHILOSOPHY OF MICHAEL MOORE (Oxford 2015) (forthcoming).

Rehabilitating Retributivism, 32 LAW & PHIL. 83 (2013) (Symposium issue).

Attempts, in Language and in Law, 6 JERUSALEM REV. LEG. STUD. 1 (2012) (Symposium issue).

The Justification of Punishment, in ANDREI MARMOR ED., THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION TO PHILOSOPHY OF LAW 141 (Routledge 2012).

Introduction: Punishment and Culpability, 9 OHIO ST. J. CRIM. L. 441 (2012) (invited guest editor for symposium).

Blackmail, in JOHN DEIGH & DAVID DOLINKO EDS., THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF CRIMINAL LAW (Oxford 2011).

Provocation Manslaughter as Partial Justification and Partial Excuse, 52 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1027 (2011) (co-authored with Ian P. Farrell).

Two Kinds of Retributivism, in R.A. DUFF & STUART GREEN EDS., THE PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CRIMINAL LAW 433 (Oxford 2011).

Punishment and Justification, 118 ETHICS 258 (2008) (translated into Spanish as Castigo y Justificación, 12 REVISTA ARGENTINA DE TEORÍA JURÍDICA 1 (2008)) (reprinted in DAVID DOLINKO ED., THE THEORETICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CRIMINAL LAW (Ashgate 2014)).

On the Moral Structure of White Collar Crime, 5 OHIO ST. J. CRIM. L. 301 (2007) (solicited book review).

Reply–Meta-blackmail and the Evidentiary Theory: Still Taking Motives Seriously, 94 GEO. L.J. 787 (2006).

Lesser Evils and Justification: A Less Close Look, 24 LAW & PHIL. 681 (2005).

Justification and Excuse, Law and Morality, 53 DUKE L.J. 1 (2003) (selected as best paper in jurisprudence for the 2002 Stanford/Yale Junior Faculty Forum).

The Evidentiary Theory of Blackmail: Taking Motives Seriously, 65 U. CHI. L. REV. 795 (1998).

Promoting Values: A Comment on Catalyzing Fans, 6 Harv. J. Sports & Ent. L. __ (forthcoming 2015).

Sprints, Sports, and Suits, 40 J. PHIL. SPORT 163(2013).

On Interpretivism and Formalism in Sports Officiating: From General to Particular Jurisprudence, 38 J. PHIL. SPORT 177 (2011) (Symposium issue).

Replay, 99 CAL. L. REV. 1683 (2011).

“Let ‘em Play”: A Study in the Jurisprudence of Sport, 99 GEO. L.J. 1325 (2011).

Abuse of Property Right Without Political Foundations: A Reply to Katz, 124 YALE L.J. F. 42  (2014). http://yalelawjournal.org/forum/abuse-of-property-right-without-politicalfoundations-a-response-to-katz.

Alexander’s Genius, 12 APA NEWSLETTER PHIL. LAW 1 (2012).

The Normative Functions of Coercion Claims, 8 LEGAL THEORY 45 (2002).

 Hasn’t Kesen Hu Suffered Enough?, Austin American-Statesman, Feb. 21, 2010.

After Further Review: The NFL’s Instant Replay System Doesn’t Work. Here’s How To Fix It, Slate.com, Dec. 22, 2009.

Brief for Appellee Charles Soechting In Support of Appellants, LULAC v. Perry, 126 S. Ct. 2594 (2006), available at 2006 WL 53998 (with Robert M. Long).

Democracies Young and Old Need Restraint, Dallas Morning News, May 20, 2005.

Putting Fairness on the Map: The high court has a chance to ease flagrant partisan gerrymandering, L.A. Times, May 28, 2004.

Brief of Amici Curiae Law Professors in Support of Respondents, Pierce County v. Guillen, 537 U.S. 129 (2003), available at 2002 WL 1964091 (with Lynn A. Baker)